Best Known (65, 65+71, s)-Nets in Base 9
(65, 65+71, 165)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (65, 136, 165)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (64, 136, 165)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (64, 164)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 64 and N(F) ≥ 165, using
- T4 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 64 and N(F) ≥ 165, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (64, 164)-sequence over F9, using
(65, 65+71, 212)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (65, 136, 212)-net over F9, using
(65, 65+71, 8312)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (65, 136, 8313)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (65, 135, 8313)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 667 488463 756351 123127 661727 587538 241144 677395 912210 025811 271839 404274 319518 692923 169293 681744 961340 321127 457825 947449 868237 447705 > 9135 [i]