Best Known (61, 61+73, s)-Nets in Base 9
(61, 61+73, 114)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (61, 134, 114)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (8, 44, 40)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 39)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 40, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 39)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (17, 90, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (8, 44, 40)-net over F9, using
(61, 61+73, 192)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (61, 134, 192)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 191)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 61 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
(61, 61+73, 5962)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (61, 134, 5963)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (61, 133, 5963)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 8 221514 439612 558100 079018 944386 355148 722267 752181 473600 500845 508576 126122 482001 829029 825125 070014 747841 916599 657484 023430 242145 > 9133 [i]