Best Known (33, 33+74, s)-Nets in Base 9
(33, 33+74, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (33, 107, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 107, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(33, 33+74, 128)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (33, 107, 128)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
(33, 33+74, 1030)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (33, 107, 1031)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1 296624 949733 601121 475267 128267 032862 272015 554737 453962 827640 023061 965914 796950 202314 639761 465938 316825 > 9107 [i]