Best Known (95−75, 95, s)-Nets in Base 9
(95−75, 95, 74)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (20, 95, 74)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (17, 95, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
(95−75, 95, 84)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (20, 95, 84)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (19, 95, 84)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 83)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 84, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 83)-sequence over F9, using
(95−75, 95, 464)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (20, 95, 465)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (20, 94, 465)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 530596 835020 115882 370757 835734 418956 525334 549316 743081 151264 683085 189557 515906 482959 454249 > 994 [i]