Best Known (27, 27+75, s)-Nets in Base 9
(27, 27+75, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (27, 102, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 102, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(27, 27+75, 110)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (27, 102, 110)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (26, 102, 110)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 109)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 110, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 109)-sequence over F9, using
(27, 27+75, 714)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (27, 102, 715)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (27, 101, 715)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 2 404988 029109 970608 261469 637721 698463 829551 160479 285123 230527 995765 180484 783908 618762 491491 983289 > 9101 [i]