Best Known (60, 60+75, s)-Nets in Base 9
(60, 60+75, 108)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (60, 135, 108)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 43, 34)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 33)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 33)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (17, 92, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (6, 43, 34)-net over F9, using
(60, 60+75, 190)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (60, 135, 190)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (60, 189)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 60 and N(F) ≥ 190, using
(60, 60+75, 5210)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (60, 135, 5211)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (60, 134, 5211)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 74 336252 534086 687731 425647 994581 714718 547560 589166 778000 187077 941333 077675 227029 330149 441476 109159 115493 441868 000947 869510 851129 > 9134 [i]