Best Known (23, 23+79, s)-Nets in Base 9
(23, 23+79, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (23, 102, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 102, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(23, 23+79, 92)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (23, 102, 92)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 91)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 92, using
(23, 23+79, 546)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (23, 102, 547)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (23, 101, 547)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 2 555358 466838 519203 110197 232335 988492 143216 874436 643671 438226 257103 802224 746643 863208 725342 546473 > 9101 [i]