Best Known (35, 35+79, s)-Nets in Base 9
(35, 35+79, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (35, 114, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 114, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(35, 35+79, 128)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (35, 114, 128)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 114, 128)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
(35, 35+79, 1096)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (35, 114, 1097)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (35, 113, 1097)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 694087 851719 610120 882099 763912 964090 390117 369031 461288 466117 896732 518763 426554 858780 037100 825338 777190 895417 > 9113 [i]