Best Known (48, 48+79, s)-Nets in Base 9
(48, 48+79, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (48, 127, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 127, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(48, 48+79, 163)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (48, 127, 163)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (48, 162)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 48 and N(F) ≥ 163, using
(48, 48+79, 2305)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (48, 127, 2306)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (48, 126, 2306)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1 723359 996057 327824 442470 993782 971598 890691 720522 591792 845038 968744 973917 837686 641522 679783 157894 603827 464442 512062 762545 > 9126 [i]