Best Known (104−81, 104, s)-Nets in Base 9
(104−81, 104, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (23, 104, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 104, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(104−81, 104, 92)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (23, 104, 92)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 91)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 92, using
(104−81, 104, 540)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (23, 104, 541)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (23, 103, 541)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 199 450056 042081 239805 686858 786404 176156 011248 115023 625016 763359 707134 526917 062225 973346 934133 214529 > 9103 [i]