Best Known (35, 35+81, s)-Nets in Base 9
(35, 35+81, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (35, 116, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 116, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(35, 35+81, 128)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (35, 116, 128)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 116, 128)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
(35, 35+81, 1067)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (35, 116, 1068)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (35, 115, 1068)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 55 752995 286742 311783 325611 212422 305031 137975 469971 693534 769439 141921 949508 105109 730385 345494 034404 431819 174145 > 9115 [i]