Best Known (65, 65+82, s)-Nets in Base 9
(65, 65+82, 165)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (65, 147, 165)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (64, 147, 165)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (64, 164)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 64 and N(F) ≥ 165, using
- T4 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 64 and N(F) ≥ 165, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (64, 164)-sequence over F9, using
(65, 65+82, 192)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (65, 147, 192)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (61, 147, 192)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 191)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 61 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 191)-sequence over F9, using
(65, 65+82, 5297)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (65, 147, 5298)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 188 355175 993570 858002 912001 501042 177720 437569 194742 014246 059458 095855 031455 135621 431312 992594 781470 312317 880648 403811 569037 917367 876965 745425 > 9147 [i]