Best Known (67, 67+82, s)-Nets in Base 9
(67, 67+82, 165)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (67, 149, 165)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (64, 149, 165)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (64, 164)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 64 and N(F) ≥ 165, using
- T4 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 64 and N(F) ≥ 165, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (64, 164)-sequence over F9, using
(67, 67+82, 192)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (67, 149, 192)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (61, 149, 192)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 191)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 61 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 191)-sequence over F9, using
(67, 67+82, 5899)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (67, 149, 5900)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 15232 279681 682571 407760 827510 732487 706978 050563 771403 823841 365810 169648 098332 802941 717155 939206 480816 478335 128155 922149 728561 558316 404353 842529 > 9149 [i]