Best Known (68, 68+82, s)-Nets in Base 9
(68, 68+82, 165)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (68, 150, 165)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (64, 150, 165)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (64, 164)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 64 and N(F) ≥ 165, using
- T4 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 64 and N(F) ≥ 165, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (64, 164)-sequence over F9, using
(68, 68+82, 192)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (68, 150, 192)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (61, 150, 192)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 191)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 61 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 191)-sequence over F9, using
(68, 68+82, 6225)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (68, 150, 6226)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 136918 379895 517478 728090 103063 628591 210160 711138 960285 309930 333744 929879 698758 259081 157026 974089 782346 973565 637999 797976 349990 557615 771176 679441 > 9150 [i]