Best Known (133−85, 133, s)-Nets in Base 9
(133−85, 133, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (48, 133, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 133, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(133−85, 133, 163)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (48, 133, 163)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (48, 162)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 48 and N(F) ≥ 163, using
(133−85, 133, 2033)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (48, 133, 2034)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (48, 132, 2034)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 915120 845294 447287 000265 987880 386206 997788 671124 240266 651811 390836 696893 598937 585190 283869 777681 338528 973658 080611 925620 314465 > 9132 [i]