Best Known (149−85, 149, s)-Nets in Base 9
(149−85, 149, 165)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (64, 149, 165)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (64, 164)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 64 and N(F) ≥ 165, using
- T4 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 64 and N(F) ≥ 165, using
(149−85, 149, 192)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (64, 149, 192)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (61, 149, 192)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 191)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 61 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 191)-sequence over F9, using
(149−85, 149, 4730)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (64, 149, 4731)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (64, 148, 4731)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1694 253845 210544 719522 015105 008260 780764 769230 988415 042337 231448 527490 476687 457033 726231 878743 725554 526530 158310 772637 114264 168880 916811 504113 > 9148 [i]