Best Known (61, 61+85, s)-Nets in Base 9
(61, 61+85, 98)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (61, 146, 98)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 48, 34)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 33)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 33)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (13, 98, 64)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (6, 48, 34)-net over F9, using
(61, 61+85, 192)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (61, 146, 192)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 191)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 61 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
(61, 61+85, 4039)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (61, 146, 4040)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (61, 145, 4040)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 2 321642 184927 870085 205889 038230 357716 966232 778996 003596 820300 036817 934764 970900 826637 686309 146450 551283 192743 024321 091268 690538 016672 207745 > 9145 [i]