Best Known (20, 20+86, s)-Nets in Base 9
(20, 20+86, 74)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (20, 106, 74)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (17, 106, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
(20, 20+86, 84)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (20, 106, 84)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (19, 106, 84)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 83)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 84, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 83)-sequence over F9, using
(20, 20+86, 449)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (20, 106, 450)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 153843 012927 383866 466687 581297 375170 608919 156673 177932 739828 730091 339899 462174 599483 821900 666640 560625 > 9106 [i]