Best Known (64, 64+86, s)-Nets in Base 9
(64, 64+86, 165)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (64, 150, 165)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (64, 164)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 64 and N(F) ≥ 165, using
- T4 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 64 and N(F) ≥ 165, using
(64, 64+86, 192)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (64, 150, 192)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (61, 150, 192)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 191)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 61 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 191)-sequence over F9, using
(64, 64+86, 4472)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (64, 150, 4473)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 137113 194947 808095 570228 405041 779796 763132 075083 040133 488989 635103 735023 919537 884586 161050 166866 980471 081328 302466 596307 848853 465694 786141 573465 > 9150 [i]