Best Known (126−87, 126, s)-Nets in Base 9
(126−87, 126, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (39, 126, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 126, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(126−87, 126, 140)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (39, 126, 140)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 139)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 140, using
(126−87, 126, 1227)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (39, 126, 1228)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (39, 125, 1228)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 191293 063158 931382 802640 335028 424085 654883 879751 291740 297297 804963 077797 772022 375543 489391 558154 928497 421867 725376 060065 > 9125 [i]