Best Known (40, 40+87, s)-Nets in Base 9
(40, 40+87, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (40, 127, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 127, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(40, 40+87, 140)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (40, 127, 140)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (39, 127, 140)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 139)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 140, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 139)-sequence over F9, using
(40, 40+87, 1293)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (40, 127, 1294)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (40, 126, 1294)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1 735954 184281 308744 999112 694238 785312 016495 281433 226336 168641 550424 266083 121779 347851 307487 675079 608664 067767 780645 380753 > 9126 [i]