Best Known (15, 15+9, s)-Nets in Base 9
(15, 15+9, 232)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (15, 24, 232)-net over F9, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (15, 26, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 13, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 13, 116)-net over F81, using
(15, 15+9, 574)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (15, 24, 574)-net over F9, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(924, 574, F9, 9) (dual of [574, 550, 10]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(924, 728, F9, 9) (dual of [728, 704, 10]-code), using
- the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 728 = 93−1, defining interval I = [1,9], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 10 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(924, 728, F9, 9) (dual of [728, 704, 10]-code), using
(15, 15+9, 84888)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (15, 24, 84889)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (15, 23, 84889)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 8863 297034 042616 468129 > 923 [i]