Best Known (126−90, 126, s)-Nets in Base 9
(126−90, 126, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (36, 126, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 126, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(126−90, 126, 128)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (36, 126, 128)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 126, 128)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
(126−90, 126, 1007)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (36, 126, 1008)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1 743088 034064 227160 863263 558032 142531 867646 526773 227782 296028 280954 354371 139634 772405 369067 570134 048364 720820 558005 308801 > 9126 [i]