Best Known (111−91, 111, s)-Nets in Base 9
(111−91, 111, 74)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (20, 111, 74)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (17, 111, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
(111−91, 111, 84)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (20, 111, 84)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (19, 111, 84)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 83)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 84, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 83)-sequence over F9, using
(111−91, 111, 446)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (20, 111, 447)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (20, 110, 447)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 950 663975 480715 684290 369479 682692 436498 113246 804851 367533 382241 216915 150037 701733 822328 090419 287572 964505 > 9110 [i]