Best Known (130−91, 130, s)-Nets in Base 9
(130−91, 130, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (39, 130, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 130, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(130−91, 130, 140)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (39, 130, 140)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 139)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 140, using
(130−91, 130, 1170)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (39, 130, 1171)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (39, 129, 1171)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1255 953548 717143 339634 348839 589605 665457 727366 946065 854300 545221 602742 732638 695844 182986 916815 215158 292217 617400 477469 329337 > 9129 [i]