Best Known (23, 23+91, s)-Nets in Base 9
(23, 23+91, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (23, 114, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 114, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(23, 23+91, 92)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (23, 114, 92)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 91)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 92, using
(23, 23+91, 521)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (23, 114, 522)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (23, 113, 522)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 707998 661973 197132 168733 724514 997326 388137 648237 382804 467473 831945 067833 478250 898302 787345 070617 140849 519249 > 9113 [i]