Best Known (51, 51+92, s)-Nets in Base 9
(51, 51+92, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (51, 143, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 143, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(51, 51+92, 182)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (51, 143, 182)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (50, 143, 182)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 181)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 182, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 181)-sequence over F9, using
(51, 51+92, 2054)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (51, 143, 2055)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 29013 744002 537631 132603 666232 790339 672380 953103 394948 141602 597157 097117 354749 101305 260988 239084 327519 885763 114592 042559 740999 218468 214545 > 9143 [i]