Best Known (52, 52+92, s)-Nets in Base 9
(52, 52+92, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (52, 144, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 144, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(52, 52+92, 182)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (52, 144, 182)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (50, 144, 182)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 181)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 182, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 181)-sequence over F9, using
(52, 52+92, 2156)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (52, 144, 2157)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 261606 813957 795090 970358 928731 298560 286627 218284 989589 365651 993725 773185 821932 700168 699367 668056 674174 915174 943677 987023 817484 261526 694641 > 9144 [i]