Best Known (20, 20+93, s)-Nets in Base 9
(20, 20+93, 74)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (20, 113, 74)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (17, 113, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
(20, 20+93, 84)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (20, 113, 84)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (19, 113, 84)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 83)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 84, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 83)-sequence over F9, using
(20, 20+93, 445)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (20, 113, 446)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (20, 112, 446)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 75439 015993 808751 975790 203938 682208 892166 730531 239543 475901 430039 593971 935269 656044 491863 308300 918328 216545 > 9112 [i]