Best Known (48, 48+93, s)-Nets in Base 9
(48, 48+93, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (48, 141, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 141, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(48, 48+93, 163)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (48, 141, 163)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (48, 162)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 48 and N(F) ≥ 163, using
(48, 48+93, 1776)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (48, 141, 1777)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (48, 140, 1777)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 39 890027 083998 953427 541010 257195 644740 907697 460182 497682 369667 232549 859987 728429 464161 178000 670563 238913 776011 468665 239197 980158 206769 > 9140 [i]