Best Known (32, 32+94, s)-Nets in Base 9
(32, 32+94, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (32, 126, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
(32, 32+94, 120)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (32, 126, 120)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (31, 126, 120)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 119)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 31 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (31, 119)-sequence over F9, using
(32, 32+94, 801)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (32, 126, 802)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1 752343 276331 421927 328085 665523 745810 168746 280580 405140 323298 470281 947254 048248 929694 650540 009005 820780 706831 930936 271025 > 9126 [i]