Best Known (54, 54+94, s)-Nets in Base 9
(54, 54+94, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (54, 148, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 148, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(54, 54+94, 182)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (54, 148, 182)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (50, 148, 182)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 181)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 182, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 181)-sequence over F9, using
(54, 54+94, 2293)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (54, 148, 2294)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1717 345767 287524 443614 262537 267278 520945 592970 642476 456927 334201 537315 864874 258062 218811 071983 875612 327164 846626 529707 977691 820649 753432 906385 > 9148 [i]