Best Known (135−95, 135, s)-Nets in Base 9
(135−95, 135, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (40, 135, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 135, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(135−95, 135, 140)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (40, 135, 140)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (39, 135, 140)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 139)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 140, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 139)-sequence over F9, using
(135−95, 135, 1178)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (40, 135, 1179)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (40, 134, 1179)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 76 597225 854208 992437 442301 717764 348301 659057 302038 913757 360687 684936 481827 159719 499799 756745 024001 689111 201111 013175 834957 341225 > 9134 [i]