Best Known (24, 24+95, s)-Nets in Base 9
(24, 24+95, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (24, 119, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 119, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(24, 24+95, 92)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (24, 119, 92)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (23, 119, 92)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 91)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 92, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 91)-sequence over F9, using
(24, 24+95, 542)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (24, 119, 543)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (24, 118, 543)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 40809 915763 804509 195226 693660 795198 311826 707960 093789 689284 806689 186843 104252 225567 868198 408881 901420 225166 268809 > 9118 [i]