Best Known (48, 48+95, s)-Nets in Base 9
(48, 48+95, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (48, 143, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 143, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(48, 48+95, 163)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (48, 143, 163)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (48, 162)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 48 and N(F) ≥ 163, using
(48, 48+95, 1725)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (48, 143, 1726)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (48, 142, 1726)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 3239 855849 966837 923061 919525 955775 204681 512669 093116 285085 060071 612919 572880 299046 083459 511750 826715 740645 830431 794113 295970 465592 454481 > 9142 [i]