Best Known (49, 49+95, s)-Nets in Base 9
(49, 49+95, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (49, 144, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 144, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(49, 49+95, 168)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (49, 144, 168)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 167)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 168, using
(49, 49+95, 1809)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (49, 144, 1810)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (49, 143, 1810)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 29177 745565 259291 252807 488980 039232 068793 136342 519831 110525 031454 044177 144226 126321 413301 552061 204645 937630 419876 763202 444399 877523 238705 > 9143 [i]