Best Known (50, 50+95, s)-Nets in Base 9
(50, 50+95, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (50, 145, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 145, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(50, 50+95, 182)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (50, 145, 182)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 181)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 182, using
(50, 50+95, 1897)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (50, 145, 1898)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (50, 144, 1898)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 262630 224012 522731 365124 229513 881084 965425 595475 980006 771350 909880 072198 385982 194145 451299 477534 306099 148962 157236 539348 253549 118846 576497 > 9144 [i]