Best Known (52, 52+96, s)-Nets in Base 9
(52, 52+96, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (52, 148, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 148, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(52, 52+96, 182)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (52, 148, 182)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (50, 148, 182)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 181)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 182, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 181)-sequence over F9, using
(52, 52+96, 2021)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (52, 148, 2022)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1708 400747 715317 750626 090386 037019 716404 051169 878911 605468 909747 007608 582634 765644 257502 031553 072677 287891 983866 335127 198154 630384 685755 947777 > 9148 [i]