Best Known (48, 48+97, s)-Nets in Base 9
(48, 48+97, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (48, 145, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 145, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(48, 48+97, 163)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (48, 145, 163)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (48, 162)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 48 and N(F) ≥ 163, using
(48, 48+97, 1678)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (48, 145, 1679)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (48, 144, 1679)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 261893 022779 355323 404527 496633 302708 639635 632761 096250 188037 979145 804666 971333 209190 980323 080250 830666 357577 708851 584665 436739 574080 964225 > 9144 [i]