Best Known (30, 30+99, s)-Nets in Base 9
(30, 30+99, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (30, 129, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 129, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(30, 30+99, 110)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (30, 129, 110)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (26, 129, 110)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 109)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 110, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 109)-sequence over F9, using
(30, 30+99, 713)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (30, 129, 714)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (30, 128, 714)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 147 200406 569107 859485 520413 352974 472507 832887 625654 902804 607598 210390 635675 036258 335665 877105 620848 218782 782179 232299 855697 > 9128 [i]