Best Known (86, 102, s)-Nets in Base 9
(86, 102, 597874)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (86, 102, 597874)-net over F9, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(9102, 597874, F9, 16, 16) (dual of [(597874, 16), 9565882, 17]-NRT-code), using
- OA 8-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(9102, 4782992, F9, 16) (dual of [4782992, 4782890, 17]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(9102, 4782993, F9, 16) (dual of [4782993, 4782891, 17]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(15) ⊂ Ce(12) [i] based on
- linear OA(999, 4782969, F9, 16) (dual of [4782969, 4782870, 17]-code), using an extension Ce(15) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4782968 = 97−1, defining interval I = [1,15], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 16 [i]
- linear OA(978, 4782969, F9, 13) (dual of [4782969, 4782891, 14]-code), using an extension Ce(12) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4782968 = 97−1, defining interval I = [1,12], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 13 [i]
- linear OA(93, 24, F9, 2) (dual of [24, 21, 3]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(93, 80, F9, 2) (dual of [80, 77, 3]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [0,1], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 3 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(93, 80, F9, 2) (dual of [80, 77, 3]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(15) ⊂ Ce(12) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(9102, 4782993, F9, 16) (dual of [4782993, 4782891, 17]-code), using
- OA 8-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(9102, 4782992, F9, 16) (dual of [4782992, 4782890, 17]-code), using
(86, 102, 4782993)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (86, 102, 4782993)-net over F9, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(9102, 4782993, F9, 16) (dual of [4782993, 4782891, 17]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(15) ⊂ Ce(12) [i] based on
- linear OA(999, 4782969, F9, 16) (dual of [4782969, 4782870, 17]-code), using an extension Ce(15) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4782968 = 97−1, defining interval I = [1,15], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 16 [i]
- linear OA(978, 4782969, F9, 13) (dual of [4782969, 4782891, 14]-code), using an extension Ce(12) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4782968 = 97−1, defining interval I = [1,12], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 13 [i]
- linear OA(93, 24, F9, 2) (dual of [24, 21, 3]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(93, 80, F9, 2) (dual of [80, 77, 3]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 92−1, defining interval I = [0,1], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 3 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(93, 80, F9, 2) (dual of [80, 77, 3]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(15) ⊂ Ce(12) [i] based on
(86, 102, large)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (86, 102, large)-net in base 9, because
- 14 times m-reduction [i] would yield (86, 88, large)-net in base 9, but