Best Known (49, 103, s)-Nets in Base 9
(49, 103, 106)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (49, 103, 106)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (5, 32, 32)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 31)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 31)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (17, 71, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (5, 32, 32)-net over F9, using
(49, 103, 168)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (49, 103, 168)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 167)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 168, using
(49, 103, 5948)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (49, 103, 5949)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 194 374760 560485 430121 983693 595629 804587 591008 151142 871522 647026 826849 798790 338078 348382 282916 925625 > 9103 [i]