Best Known (24, 104, s)-Nets in Base 9
(24, 104, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (24, 104, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 104, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(24, 104, 92)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (24, 104, 92)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (23, 104, 92)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 91)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 92, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 91)-sequence over F9, using
(24, 104, 572)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (24, 104, 573)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1807 265250 433445 777309 321191 513400 836415 327102 867382 282971 670758 991939 220934 300938 328892 949508 588865 > 9104 [i]