Best Known (41, 104, s)-Nets in Base 9
(41, 104, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (41, 104, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 104, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(41, 104, 140)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (41, 104, 140)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (39, 104, 140)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 139)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 140, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 139)-sequence over F9, using
(41, 104, 2279)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (41, 104, 2280)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (41, 103, 2280)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 193 854677 922157 533393 017723 764855 042024 539034 357888 170078 916165 341279 174167 441874 525073 178071 205313 > 9103 [i]