Best Known (38, 105, s)-Nets in Base 9
(38, 105, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (38, 105, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 105, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(38, 105, 128)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (38, 105, 128)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 105, 128)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
(38, 105, 1653)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (38, 105, 1654)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (38, 104, 1654)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1768 786233 447557 356242 891580 014843 983853 580273 538435 705333 812652 933837 304256 577212 823975 464077 811121 > 9104 [i]