Best Known (50, 106, s)-Nets in Base 9
(50, 106, 106)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (50, 106, 106)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (5, 33, 32)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 31)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 31)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (17, 73, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (5, 33, 32)-net over F9, using
(50, 106, 182)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (50, 106, 182)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 181)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 182, using
(50, 106, 5769)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (50, 106, 5770)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 141594 116421 468428 601052 681946 934483 720900 330441 948211 432901 716050 422183 965204 987306 881226 800937 752129 > 9106 [i]