Best Known (58, 106, s)-Nets in Base 9
(58, 106, 320)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (58, 106, 320)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 53, 160)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 160, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
(58, 106, 334)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (58, 106, 334)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 53, 167)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 166)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 167, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 166)-sequence over F81, using
(58, 106, 20069)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (58, 106, 20070)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 141291 808700 885227 601631 480055 060989 592836 542929 504507 652580 086254 990295 994740 219377 761587 625098 077569 > 9106 [i]