Best Known (37, 108, s)-Nets in Base 9
(37, 108, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (37, 108, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 108, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(37, 108, 128)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (37, 108, 128)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 108, 128)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 127)-sequence over F9, using
(37, 108, 1415)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (37, 108, 1416)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (37, 107, 1416)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1 281990 630105 389393 017373 371158 918674 673697 101777 822978 412407 335800 722150 163589 420816 644538 857764 353985 > 9107 [i]