Best Known (46, 108, s)-Nets in Base 9
(46, 108, 84)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (46, 108, 84)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (2, 33, 20)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 19)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 20, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 19)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (13, 75, 64)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (2, 33, 20)-net over F9, using
(46, 108, 94)-Net in Base 9 — Constructive
(46, 108, 94)-net in base 9, using
- base change [i] based on digital (10, 72, 94)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 93)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 94, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 93)-sequence over F27, using
(46, 108, 162)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (46, 108, 162)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (46, 161)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 46 and N(F) ≥ 162, using
(46, 108, 3257)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (46, 108, 3258)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 11 478684 403506 660462 537018 892888 534096 462731 866158 189362 206859 417024 443248 591861 281467 080086 477108 065265 > 9108 [i]