Best Known (63, 108, s)-Nets in Base 9
(63, 108, 344)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (63, 108, 344)-net over F9, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (63, 112, 344)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 56, 172)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 172, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 56, 172)-net over F81, using
(63, 108, 488)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (63, 108, 488)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 54, 244)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 243)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 244, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 243)-sequence over F81, using
(63, 108, 49514)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (63, 108, 49515)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (63, 107, 49515)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1 270511 341258 754570 384791 089242 779630 230280 230353 738225 927320 941342 489574 934082 963019 911534 993450 150161 > 9107 [i]